Moideenkutty v. Kunhimoosa
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed an appeal suit for non-prosecution as no instructions were available from the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Appeal suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/23RD KARTHIKA, 1938
AS.No. 521 of 2002 (C)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 97/1997 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR DATED 30-03-2002
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
CHERACHEM VEETTIL KALATHETHIL MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. ABDULLA, 40 YEARS, TIRUR, TIRUR TALUK, CHENNARA AMSOM, MUTTANNOOR DESOM, P.O.MUTTANNOOR (VIA) MANGALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.)
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL KUNJIMOOSA, S/O. KASMI HAJI, 34 YEARS, CHENNARA AMSOM, MUTTANNOOR DESOM, P.O.MUTTANNOOR, (VIA) MANGALAM, TIRUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR BY ADV. SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Cherachem Veettil Kalathethil Moideenkutty
- respondent
Valiya Peediyakkal Kunjimoosa
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court