economic upliftment. All members are volunteers of the petitioner society and all of them are engaged in social activities in order to achieve its objects. The petitioner is not providing employment to any person. There exists no employee-employer relationship between the society and its members. The petitioner's charitable society is not liable to pay any contribution as demanded by the respondents. According to the petitioner, the second respondent has no right or authority to assess the petitioner directing to pay contribution for the amount expended towards gift/honorarium to its members. The voluntary social charitable activities are not all, an employment as defined under the Employees' State Insurance Act or any other labour legislations. Moreover, members and voluteers are not carrying out any day to day activities. The petitioner is providing shelters to helpless people. The second respondent without considering the nature of the voluntary social charitable activities of the society, arbitrarily passed Ext.P3 order directing the petitioner to pay a sum of `4,27,928/-