The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Roy K. Paulose as not pressed on merits, as the learned counsel for the petitioner did not press the petition during the hearing on 13.07.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 7432 of 2011 (D)
PETITIONER(S):
ROY K. PAULOSE, KONNANAL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, THATTAKKUZHA.P.O THODUPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.RAJU JOSEPH (SR.) SRI.GEORGE KUTTY MATHEW SRI.C.N.MIDHUN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (AC) DEPARTMENT GOVRNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANTHAPURAM-695001.
3. THE SECRETARY,
DISTRICT PANCHAYATH IDUKKI, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH IDUKKI, KUYILIMALA.P.O, IDUKKI-685164.
4. THE CO-ORDINATOR,
R1,2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVEENDRAN R3 BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY
SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
W.P.(C) No.7432 of 2011
Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petition is not pressed. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
JUDGE
Scl.
True Copy
PA to Judge
Roy K. Paulose
The State of Kerala
The Secretary to Government, Local Self Government (AC) Department
The District Panchayath Idukki
The Co-ordinator, Idukki District Literancy Mission
A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
