The High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition as infructuous without providing substantive reasoning or discussion on the merits. The judgment was a single-line order delivered in 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 5884 of 2006 (A)
--------------------------OA. NO.91/2001 OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.
PETITIONER(S):
1. U.S. LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, PUSHPAMANGALAM, KUNDALASSERY P.O., KERALASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. N.P. RAMAN NAIR, PUSHPAMANGALAM, KUNDALASSERY P.O. KERALASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ, SRI.A.SHANAVAS KHAN, SRI.P.R.HARIKUMAR, SMT.P.V.SOBHANA.
RESPONDENT(S):
THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, KONGAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.AJAI KUMAR.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
W.P.(C).No.5884/2006
Dated this the 19th Day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Considering the nature of the reliefs sought for in the writ petition, I
am of the view that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly,
the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ms
\True copy//
P.S to Judge
U.S. LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA
N.P. RAMAN NAIR
THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, KONGAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
