The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the underlying dispute between the parties had been settled.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 4964 of 2008 (N)
PETITIONER(S):
KPL OIL MILLS LTD., IRINJALAKUDA THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY IT'S DIRECTOR MR.PAUL JOHN.
BY ADVS.SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNAMTHANAM (SR.) SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM
RESPONDENT(S):
ELECTRICAL SECTION, K.S.E.BOARD, KARUVANNUR.
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
R,R1-4 BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB R5 BY ADV. SRI.ANEESH JAMES,SC,KSEB REGULATORY COMMISSION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------W.P (C) No.4964 of 2008
--------------------Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The dispute has been settled between the parties and the writ petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
KPL OIL MILLS LTD.
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
