Allowed

K.T.Joseph v. State of Kerala & Others

Kerala HC17 Sept 2015WP(C)/34119/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Kerala held that petitioners' employees covered under the EPF Act are exempt from contribution under the Kerala Abkari Workers' Welfare Fund Act, quashing the demand and ordering issuance of renewal clearance certificates.

What did the court decide?

Quashed impugned orders; held petitioners not required to pay contribution; directed board to issue clearance certificates for licence renewal.

K.T.Joseph Vs State of Kerala & Others — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 34119 of 2009 (H)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

K.T.JOSEPH, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL CALICUT GATE, RAMANATTUKARA, CALICUT.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.JOE JOSEPH KOCHIKUNNEL SRI.REJI GEORGE

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY THE SECRETARY LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

¶11

2. THE ABKARI WELFARE FUND BOARD

¶12

REP BY THE CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶13

3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR

¶14

ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE INSPECTORS OFFICE, KOZHIKODE.

¶15

R2-3 BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO

¶16

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY LESSLIE

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-09-2015, ALONG WITH WPC. 34737/2009, WPC. 33245/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No. 34119 of 2009

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶21

EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 9.9.2005 IN W.A.NO.963/1997.

¶22

EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 12.12.1996 IN O.P.NO.4412/1999.

¶23

EXHIBIT P3: COPY OF DOCUMENT SHOWING THE COVERAGE OF EPF ACT, 1952 IN HOTEL CALICUT GATE.

¶24

EXHIBIT P4: COPY OF PRE-ASSESSMENT NOTICE DATED 30.10.2009 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO HOTEL CALICUT GATE.

¶25

EXHIBIT P5: COPY OF REPLY DATED 10.11.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶26

EXHIBIT P6: COPY OF ORDER DATED 18.11.2009 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶27

EXHIBIT P7: COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 24.1.2006 IN O.P.NO.7454/2000.

¶28

EXHIBIT P8: COPY OF ORDER DATED 13.2.2007 IN WP(C).NO.4815/2007.

/TRUE COPY/

PS TO JUDGE

vgs

ANU SIVARAMAN, J.

¶33

============================ W.P. (C) Nos.34119 & 34737 of 2009

¶34

& 33245 of 2010

¶35

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17^th day of September, 2015

¶36

J U D G M E N T

¶37

The prayers raised in these writ petitions are with regard to the challenge against the demand for contribution under the Kerala Abkari Workers' Welfare Fund Act, 1989. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the employees of the petitioners are covered under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act as well as the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and are therefore not covered under the Welfare Fund Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the question raised is squarely covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court dated 09.09.2005 in W.A. No. 963 of 1997[ Chief Welfare Fund Inspector v. M/s. Sealord Hotels(P) Ltd. ] .

¶38

In these circumstances, the impugned orders are quashed and it is held that the petitioners are not required to pay contribution under the Welfare Fund Act. The welfare fund board

¶39

W.P. (C) Nos.34119 & 34737 of 2009 & 33245 of 2010

¶40

-: 2 :-

¶41

shall issue necessary clearance certificates to the petitioners for seeking of renewal of their licence. It is also made clear that it would be open to the 1^st respondent to ensure that all the workers of the petitioners are covered under the EPF Act.

¶42

These writ petitions are disposed of as above.

¶43

Sd/-

¶44

ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE

¶45

DST

¶46

//True copy//

¶47

P.A. To Judge

K.T.Joseph v. State of Kerala & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.T.Joseph v. State of Kerala & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Pilai and Ors. Vs Industrial Tribunal,Kollam & Ors.

Symenson Patric Bivera Vs State of Kerala

Mrs.Vijayam Muraleedharan Vs State of Kerala

Sri.K.Rajendran Vs Rehabilitation Plantations Ltd.

G.Radhakrishnan Vs the Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Soci

B.Thankamani Vs the Tahsildar, Ambalapuzha