M/S.Reliance Security Agency v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937
WP(C).No. 30946 of 2010 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
M/S.RELIANCE SECURITY AGENCY, REG.NO.2111.PREM BUILDING, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM. REPRESETNED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, T.K.SAMBASIVAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.D.KISHORE SMT.MINI GOPINATH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. THE CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER,
3. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED,
4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGE(ADMN), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, O/O.THE GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM) BSNL, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.
5. MAHATMA GANDHI CHARITALBLE, SOCIETY REP BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUMALA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 006.
6. HOUSE MASTER KOCHI SECURITY MANAGEMENT, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, VADAKKAYIL BUILDING, KARAKKAMURI, KOCHI-682 001.
7. MEEGUARD INFORCE SERVICES, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, THYCAUD P.O., OPP PRS APARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 014.
8. THE SPARROWS, PETTAH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP.BY ITS MANAGER-695 024.
9. FORCE INDIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PULIMOODU P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
10. ADAMS SECUTIRY AGENCY. REP BY ITS MANAGER, PUTHUKUDY P.O., NEGARCOIL, TAMIL NADU-628 621.
R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.SAJI VARGHESE R1&R2 BY ADV.SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA.
R3 & R4 BY SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DG
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
W.P.(C).No.30946 of 2010
Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE)
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
DG
M/s. Reliance Security Agency
Union of India
Chief Labour Commissioner
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Assistant General Manager (Admin), BSNL
Mahatma Gandhi Charitable Society
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court