The High Court dismissed this writ petition seeking directions to run a piggery, holding it infructuous due to new mandatory licensing rules, despite earlier rejection of applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/16TH BHADRA, 1937
WP(C).No. 2216 of 2009 (L)
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
M.D. VARGHESE, S/O. DEVASSIA, MYPPADAN VEEDU, EDOOR AMSOM, P.O. PAYAM, IRITTY, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.ASOKAN
SMT.S.AMINA
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. ARALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ADOOR, PAYAM.P.O, IRITTY, KANNUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. SECRETARY,
BY ADV. SRI.R.SURENDRAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.2216 of 2009
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed, inter alia, seeking directions to permit the petitioner to run a piggery in the limits of the 1st respondent Panchayat. Though the applications were rejected as early as in 2009, it is submitted by the petitioner that other units were being allowed to function. In any view of the matter since new rules have been promulgated and licence has been made mandatory, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Hence this writ petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Anu Sivaraman, Judge
sj
M.D. Varghese
Aralam Grama Panchayath
Secretary, Aralam Grama Panchayath
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
