The writ petition was heard but no arguments were presented by counsel. The court dismissed the petition categorizing it as 'not pressed' without merits.
The writ petition was dismissed as it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936
WP(C).No. 2770 of 2014 (U)
PETITIONER:
REMIYA ANIYAN, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.ANIYAN MATHEW, MANGALATH HOUSE, CHELOOR P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENTS:
1. THRISSUR CORPORATION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE THRISSUR-680001.
2. DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER, TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, THRISSUR.
3. CHIEF TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.N.HARIDAS R1 BY ADV. SMT.C.B.SUMA DEVI R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. SHERIN R BY SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Scl.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
W.P.(C) No. 2770 of 2014
Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
matter is not pressed. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
Scl.
True Copy
PA to Judge
REMIYA ANIYAN
THRISSUR CORPORATION
DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER, TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, THRISSUR
CHIEF TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
