In a contempt case (C)No. 329 of 2015, the petitioner reported that the high court's prior direction in W.P.(C)No. 27444/2014 was complied with. The court closed the contempt proceedings without further consideration.
Contempt case closed as not surviving for further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 329 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27444/2014 DATED 21-10-2014
PETITIONER:
SMT.SONIA GEORGE, AGED 38 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(MALAYALAM) ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL SULTHAN BATHERI P.O PIN 673 592
BY ADVS.SRI.S.K.BALACHANDRAN SRI.V.K.NANDAKUMARAN
RESPONDENTS:
DR.VISHWAS MEHTHA S/O.(NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AGE (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., GOVT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.I.SANJEETHA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 329 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE AI: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.10.2014 IN WP(C) NO.27444/2014.
ANNEXURE A2: LETTER DATED 31.10.2014.
ANNEXURE A3: POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
TRUE COPY
PA TO JUDGE
Scl.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Cont. Case (C) No.329 of 2015
Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
On 21st October 2014, this Court disposed of W.P.(C)
No.27444 of 2014 with the following direction:
“In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court, without adverting to the merits of the matter, disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P5 communication sent by the 3rd respondent in the light of Ext.P6 representation submitted by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard in person to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Once the clarification is received from the Government, the 3rd respondent shall consider Ext.P4 representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon within one month from the date of receipt of clarification from the 1st respondent. No order as to costs.”
Annexure A1 judgment dated 21.10.2014, the petitioner has
Cont. Case (C) No.329 of 2015
filed the present contempt of court case.
In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court closes the contempt of court case as having not survived for
further consideration.
Sd/DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
Scl.
Sonia George
Dr. Vishwas Mehta
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
