Allowed

Jamaludheen P.H v. Thalikkulam Grama Panchayat

Kerala HC6 Mar 2015WP(C)/2410/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court followed the ratio in Shahnaz Shukkoor to dispose of the petition by setting aside the rejection of a building permit. It directed the Panchayat to consider the application afresh with physical verification and expiry orders within one month.

What did the court decide?

Order Ext.P5 set aside. 1st respondent to consider building permission application afresh with physical verification and pass orders within one month.

Jamaludheen P.H Vs Thalikkulam Grama Panchayat — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/15TH PHALGUNA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 2410 of 2015 (A)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

JAMALUDHEEN P.H., AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.HAMEED, PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, THALIKKULAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.C.D.DILEEP

¶9

RESPONDENTS:-

¶10

THALIKKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THALIKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 569 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶11

SECRETARY,

¶12

LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (A.R) DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶13

R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER

¶14

R BY SRI. JUSTIN JACOB, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

WP(C).No. 2410 of 2015 (A)

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

¶19

EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.2071/2004 OF THE VATANAPPILLY SUB REGISTRY, THRISSUR DATED 29.09.2004.

¶20

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT OF THE PROPERTY DATED 12.03.2014.

¶21

EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 29.10.2014.

¶22

EXHIBIT P4. A TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH APPLICATION.

¶23

EXHIBIT P5. A TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.12.2014 REJECTING THE BUILDING PERMIT.

¶24

EXHIBIT P5(a): ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P5 ORDER.

¶25

EXHIBIT P6. TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY.

¶26

EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, THALIKULAM DATED 30.01.2015 CERTIFYING THAT THE SURVEY NO.101/4 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE DRAFT DATA BANK ON WET LAND AND PADDY LAND FOR THALIKULAM VILLAGE.

¶27

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL

/True Copy/

P.A to Judge.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

¶32

---------------------------------W.P. (C) No. 2410 of 2015 (A)

¶33

¶34

Dated this the 6^th day of March, 2015.

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

In the light of the ratio laid down in Shahnaz Shukkoor v. Chelannur Grama Panchayat (2009 (3) KLT 899), this Court disposes of the writ petition on the same lines applying the ratio laid down by this Court in the said decision, thereby setting aside Ext.P5.

¶37

Consequently, the 1^st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner, after subjecting the land in question to physical verification, and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶38

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

¶39

¶40

W.P.(C) No.19225/2014 -2-

Jamaludheen P.H v. Thalikkulam Grama Panchayat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamaludheen P.H v. Thalikkulam Grama Panchayat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Dileepkumar Vs Antony Chacko

Shanil P.Y Vs State of Kerala

Smitha Santhosh Vs State of Kerala

P. Madhavan Vs Valsan Madathil

T.V. Moideen Vs Chittur - Thathamangalam Municipality

Joshy P.K. Vs Corporation of Kochi