Dismissed
D.Dileepkumar v. Antony Chacko
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/79/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/14TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 79 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).25894/2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25894/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-10-2014
PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER :
D.DILEEPKUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. DAMODARAN, DRIVER GRADE-I, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CENTRAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.N.MANU THAMPI
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT :
ANTONY CHACKO, AGED 50 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.
R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 79 of 2015 (S)
: 2 :
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE I: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.10.2014 IN W.P. (C) NO. 25894/2014.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE : NIL
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge.
rv
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
---------------------------------Contempt Case (C) No. 79 of 2015 (S) in W.P. (C) No. 25894 of 2014
---------------------------------Dated this the 5th day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
Both the learned counsel have reported that the directions in judgment dated 20.10.2014 in W.P.(C) No. 25894 of 2014 has been complied with. Recording the said submission of the respective counsel for the petitioner and also the respondent, this Court closes the Contempt Case as having not survived for consideration.
sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(C). No. -2-
D. Dileepkumar
Antony Chacko
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court