The High Court dismissed the writ petition as abated because the petitioner, Venugopal C, was deceased and no steps were taken to implead his legal representatives.
The writ petition was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/16TH BHADRA, 1937
WP(C).No. 25630 of 2011 (C)
PETITIONER:
VENUGOPAL C, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.MEENAKSHY AMMA, CHACKOTH HOUSE, AVITTAPPILLY P.O MATTATHUR, THRISSUR DT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
AYINIKKAL HOUSE, MATTATHUR, THRISSUR DIST.PIN 680 121.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL R1 BY ADV. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN R4 BY ADV. SRI.N.P.SAMUEL R4 BY ADV. SRI.PLEASANT.T.SAMUEL
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY LESLIE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
| EXHIBIT P1. | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.2639/2010 DATED 28.01.2010. |
|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2. | TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 02.08.2008 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR MUKUNDAPURAM. |
EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.1.2009 OF THE ADDL. TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM. EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.4.2009 OF THE IST RESPONDENT PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT P5. TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH PREPARED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.25630 of 2011
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that the writ petitioner is no more and no steps have been taken to implead his legal representatives. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as abated.
Anu Sivaraman, Judge
sj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the petitioner is no more and legal representatives have not been impleaded.
Venugopal C
Mattathur Gramapanchayat
Tahsildar Irinjalakuda
Village Officer Mattathur
Marys
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
