Petitioner challenged pension qualifying service refixation. Court directed the respondent to consider the pending representation (Ext.P5) with notice and disposed of the writ petition within two months.
Direction to respondent to consider the pending representation (Ext.P5) with notice to the petitioner within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/4TH ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 19036 of 2015 (D)
PETITIONER:
A.T. THOMAS, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS, RTD. INSPECTOR, KSRTC, KATTAPPANA AND RESIDING AT AZHACHERIL, KALTHOTTY P.O., AYYAPPANCOIL, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K. SATHEESH KUMAR
RESPONDENT:
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 19036/2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER (NO. 47915) EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED ON 05.11.2009. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR MEMORANDUM DATED 06.07.010. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 14191/2013 AND CONNECTED CASES DATED 01.07.2013. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED ON 25.05.2015.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
WP(C) NO. 19036 OF 2015
Dated this the 25th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks refixation of the qualifying service for pension. The petitioner relies on Ext.P4 judgment in WP(C) No. 14191/2013 and connected cases. Ext.P5 representation filed by the petitioner in this regard is pending.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
ncd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the surrender of the pending representation (Ext.P5) is sufficient to dispose of the petition without considering the merits of the claim.
A.T. Thomas
The Managing Director, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
