K.S.Binu v. Assistant Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 18832 of 2015 (D)
PETITIONER:
K.S.BINU, AGED 36 YEARS
S/O.SUKUMARAN, KARAKUNNATH HOUSE, KOLAPRA KARA KUDAYATHUR P.O, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI.
BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
1. ASSISTANT ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION MOOLAMATTOM - 685 585
2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BY SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SC, KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DCS
WP(C).No. 18832 of 2015 (D)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 26.3.14. EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.3.14. EXHIBIT P3. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.6.14. EXHIBIT P4. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8.4.15. EXHIBIT P5. COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 9.4.15. EXHIBIT P6. COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). NO. 18832 OF 2015
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
True it is that there existed a low tension electricity line drawn across the property of the petitioner. The attempt now is to draw a 11KV electricity line along the same route. The petitioner contends that the 11KV electricity line can be drawn along the side of the public road. There is no necessity to dissect the property into two when alternate route along the road side or the boundary of the property exists.
Nair v. KSEB [2015 (2) KLT 947] . The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext. P4 representation with the second respondent.
W.P.(C). NO. 18832 OF 2015
of a copy of this judgment. The status quo as on today shall be maintained till orders are passed on Ext. P4 representation as directed above.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gopinathan Nair v. KSEBReferred¶29
Gopinathan Nair v. KSEB [2015 (2) KLT 947]
K.S.Binu
Assistant Engineer Kerala State Electricity Board
Executive Engineer
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court