The High Court rejected the petitioner's review petition, finding no error apparent on the face of the record and disallowing the request for review of the underlying judgment abstracting electricity charges.
The Review Petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2015/1ST ASHADHA, 1937
RP.No. 535 of 2015 () IN WP(C).14199/2015
AGAINST THEJUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14199/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-05-2015
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
K.P.RAJEEVAN, AGED 54 YEARS S/O.PADMANABHAN, STAR VISION CABLE, EROOR ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT(S):
R BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------R.P.No.535 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No.14199 of 2015 --------------------Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2015
O R D E R
The petitioner himself concedes that television cables have been drawn unauthorisedly at least through negligible number of posts. This is precisely why the condition to deposit one-half of the amount demanded was imposed pending consideration of the representation.
The Review Petition is dismissed.
Sd/V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether any error apparent on the face of the record justifies review of the judgment.
Whether the petitioner has made out any case for review.
K.P. Rajeevan
Kerala State Electricity Board Limited
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
