Disposed

M.Ramaswamy Iyer v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Jul 2015WP(C)/17580/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The high court disposed of a writ petition regarding re-assignment of acquired land. The petitioner had an acquired plot left unused with compensation deposited. The court directed the Authorities to evaluate the request for re-assignment within six months after hearing. Applicants were required to appear before the Principal Secretary of Revenue.

What did the court decide?

Court directed Principal Secretary to consider application within 6 months; Petitioner to appear and produce documents.

M.Ramaswamy Iyer Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 17580 of 2004 (P)

¶6

PETITIONER :

¶7

M. RAMASWAMY IYER,

¶8

AGED 70 YEARS, SON OF MAHADEVA IYER, RESIDING AT, T.C.15/2001, WOMEN'S COLLEGE LANE, TRIVANDRUM-695 014.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S) :

¶11

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE TRIVANDRUM.

¶12

2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶13

3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VANCHIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM.

¶14

*ADDL. R4 IMPLEADED

¶15

---------------------------------

¶16

*ADDL.R4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN – 695 001.

¶17

*ADDL. R4 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER JUDGMENT DATED 07/07/2015.

¶18

R1 TO R3 & ADDL. R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

¶21

...2/-

¶22

WP(C).No. 17580 of 2004 (P)

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

¶25

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF PASSING AWARD WITH NOTICE.

¶26

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF LETTER FROM SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 29/8/90.

¶27

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 21-1-2004.

¶28

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

P.A. TO JUDGE

¶31

¶32

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J

¶33

- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 17580 of 2004

¶34

¶35

Dated this the 07^th day of July, 2015

¶36

The petitioner is the owner of a residential plot in

¶37

survey No. IS 90/7/18 of Nemom village. In 1987, it is stated that a protective bund was constructed by the Irrigation Department of the PWD Division on the Karamana River and a strip of land measuring 1.40 Ares was acquired from the petitioner's property to

¶38

put up a ring road. A sum of Rs.26,857.70 was awarded in lieu of the acquisition which is evident at Ext.P1. The said amount is said to have been deposited before the Sub Court, Trivandrum by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, P.W.D, South Circle, Thiruvananthapuram, as compensation in L.A No.29/1987 dated 1.8.1987. However,the said land was not used for the construction

¶39

of the road and it remained as such.

¶40

On 29.08.1990 a communication at Ext.P2 was

¶41

addressed by the Executive Engineer to the petitioner informing

¶42

WPC.No.17850/2004

¶43

: 2 :

¶44

him that the said land is no more required and the petitioner could

¶45

seek re-assignment of the property. The petitioner made an application before the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue as seen at Ext.P3. The petitioner categorically stated that the award amount deposited before the Sub Court has not been withdrawn. The petitioner also undertook to pay the cost of the land as determined by the District Collector. In such circumstance, it is only appropriate that if the land still lies without any perceivable intention of utilisation; then, the petitioners' application be considered.

¶46

The Principal Secretary shall issue notice to the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Thiruvananthapuram and after getting a report of the cost of the land as assessed by the District Collector, shall consider the application of the petitioner. The petitioner shall appear before the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Kerala, Government

¶47

WPC.No.17850/2004

¶48

: 3 :

¶49

Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram Pin. 695 001, who is suo motu

¶50

impleaded as the additional 4^th respondent in the writ petition, on 21.07.2015. The petitioner shall produce the certified copy of the

¶51

judgment and the copy of this writ petition along with the documents, before the additional respondent and also make a formal application for re-assignment of land. The additional respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders at any rate, within period of six months from the date of appearance of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of personal hearing.

¶52

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

jma

//true copy//

P.A to Judge

M.Ramaswamy Iyer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ramaswamy Iyer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Vs the Chief Engineering, Department of

Managing Partner,Ashok Drugs Wholesale Vs Drugs Controller

Mathai K P Vs State of Kerala

Udayakumar. C Vs Sam C Itticheriyan

Jameela Vs the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms)

Sirajudeen Muhammed Rasheed Vs Union of India