Naseer C v. the Secretary, Rta, Malappuram
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a suo moto revision of stage carriage timings. The Court held that the grievance of non-hearing warranted disposal by directing the respondent to consider objections after an opportunity of being hearing.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of directing respondent to pass orders on petitioner's objection after affording opportunity of hearing
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/13TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 15443 of 2015 (E)
PETITIONER(S) :
NASEER C., S/O.ENI, CHERUKAT HOUSE, PATHAPPIRIYAM, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN- 676 505.
2. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 039.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision of stage carriage timings by the respondent authority without a hearing violates the principles of natural justice and applicable guidelines.
Whether the petitioner, who filed objections within the stipulated period, has a right to be heard before the impugned order is enforced.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Naser C.
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram
- respondent
The State Transport Authority, Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court