Disposed

Navas V.K v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC12 Aug 2015WP(C)/15138/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala issued directions for compounding offences under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2015 and Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2015. Petitioners were directed to pay specific sums for each vehicle (tippers, JCBs) before their release, along with production of registration certificates to the Geologist.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with directions to compound offences upon payment of specified fines, royalties, and production of registration certificates; vehicles released upon compliance.

Navas V.K Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/21ST SRAVANA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 15138 of 2015 (N)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

1. NAVAS V.K,

¶8

S/O. KAREEM, AGED 36 YEARS, VEVUKADU HOUSE, ELOOR NORTH, UDAYOGAMANDAL P.O., NORTH PARUR.

¶9

2. RAMESH M S/O. MANI, AGED 32 YEARS, HOUSE NO. 380 (16/359), ITD NALLATHANI, MUNNAR - 10.

¶10

3. RAJESH K.R ,

¶11

S/O. K.G.RAMANCHANDRAN, AGED 39 YEARS, KALEEL HOUSE, HOUSE NO. 19/350A, PD ROAD, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI - 682 006.

¶12

4. RAFEEQUE B.M

¶13

S/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 38 YEARS, KERITHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKALA, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682

¶14

5. MARYDASAN P.J

¶15

S/O. JOSEPH, HOUSE NO. 1/502D, PERUMGATTU HOUSE,

¶16

THUTHIYOOR, CSEZ P.O., KAKKANAD - 682 037.

¶17

6. SHAMSUDHEEN K.I,

¶18

S/O. ISMAIL, KILLIYANKAL HOUSE, PADAMUKAL,

¶19

THRIKKAKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 021.

¶20

7. SHAJI A.N.,

¶21

S/O. MAMMIC, HOUSE NO.7/962, PANDARAPARAMBIL HOUSE,

¶22

PANAYAPPALLY, KOCHI - 682 002.

¶23

BY ADV. SRI.LEO GEORGE

¶24

RESPONDENT(S):

¶25

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

¶26

Cont....2

¶27

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM-682 020

¶28

ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED

¶29

3. SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM

¶30

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR

¶31

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶32

¶33

WP(C).No. 15138 of 2015 (N)

¶34

APPENDIX

¶35

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶36

EXHIBIT P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE FIFTH PETITIONER BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL7 BR 3845.

¶37

EXHIBIT P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE SIX PETITIONER BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF JCB BERAING REGISTRARION NO. KL13 M 1060.

¶38

EXHIBIT P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE SEVENTH PETITION BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL43 E 639.

¶39

EXHIBIT P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE FIFTH PETITIONER BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL7 BV 985.

¶40

EXHIBIT P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPOUNDING APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED. 18.5.15.

¶41

EXHIBIT P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC NO. 5224/15 DT. 24.2.15.

¶42

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶48

W.P.(C).No.15138 of 2015

¶49

Dated this the 12^th day of August, 2015

¶50

JUDGMENT

¶51

The petitioners in the above writ petition were aggrieved with the seizure of their vehicles for alleged commission of offence under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2015 (for short KMMC Rules) and Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2015. The petitioners had made an application for compounding the offence under the KMMC Rules, 2015. This Court had, by way of an interim order dated 26.05.2015, directed that the petitioners' vehicles be released on payment of Rs.25,000/- each subject to further orders.

¶52

In a batch of writ petitions numbered as W.P (C) No.14605 of 2015 and connected cases, this Court has considered the aforesaid issue and directed the Government to bring appropriate amendments to the Rules so as to avoid the arbitrary exercise of the discretionary power, conferred on the authorities, under the compounding provision. However, for the pending

¶53

W.P.(C).No.15138 of 2015 2

¶54

cases, this Court had directed that compounding of tipper lorries to be effected on payment of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each as also double the amount of royalty and the price of the mineral illegally transported as determined by the Geologist on an assessment of the maximum quantity that could be transported in the goods vehicle which had been seized. The offence as against JCB's were directed to be compounded on payment of Rs.75,000/- The very same direction shall apply herein also, with respect to each of the vehicles. The petitioner shall produce the registration certificate before the Geologist-additional 3^rd respondent suo motu impleaded within two weeks, and if not the vehicle shall be liable for seizure. The additional 3^rd respondent shall determine the said amount and deduct the amounts paid by virtue of the interim order on production of the receipt of such payment. On payment of the aforesaid sums offence shall be compounded. The compounding made shall be marked in the registration certificate of the vehicles and communicated to the Motor Vehicle Department. If the

¶55

W.P.(C).No.15138 of 2015

¶56

¶57

petitioner does not comply with the above order the vehicles shall be liable for seizure and the petitioner shall be liable to be prosecuted.

¶58

Writ petition is disposed of.

¶59

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE

¶60

Navas V.K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navas V.K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joy Vs Dist.Collector, Thiruvananthapuram

Sabin Vs the District Collector

Vishnu Fuels Vs Union of India

Abdul Salam Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Mukesh Vs District Collector

Sreedharan Vs State of Kerala