Allowed

Joy v. Dist.Collector, Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala HC11 Aug 2015WP(C)/1793/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the District Collector imposing a fine without initiating proceedings under the Protection of River Banks Act. The Court held quantum of fine unclear and without legal basis, ordered refund of amounts remitted under interim order and release of vehicles.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed. Amounts remitted under interim order shall be immediately refunded to the petitioner. Vehicles shall be released without any fine being remitted.

Joy Vs Dist.Collector, Thiruvananthapuram — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2007 / 28TH PAUSHA 1928

¶4

WP(C).No. 1793 of 2007(L)

PETITIONER:

JOY, AGED 36, S/O.JOSEPH, VISHAKAM, H.NO.13/446, THOONGAMPARA, NELLIYOTTUKONAM, KATTAKKADA.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

¶12

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶13

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶16

W.P.(C).No.1793 of 2007

¶17

Dated this the 11^th day of August, 2015

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

The petitioner is the registered owner of lorry bearing Reg.No.Kl.01.AD/6166 and a tipper lorry bearing Reg.No.KL.01/20-2162. The petitioner had purchased sand from Tamil Nadu and was transporting it into the State of Kerala. The police attached to Thiruvallam Police Station seized both the vehicles. The report was also forwarded by the Police to the District Collector to initiate confiscation proceedings under Section 23 of Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. The petitioner moved an application Ext.P7, before the District Collector for release of the vehicles. No proceedings till now has been initiated under the Act of 2001.

¶20

The petitioner approached the Judicial

¶21

Magistrate Court for seeking release of the vehicles. On calling for a report from the District Collector, the District Collector by Ext.P8 informed the learned Magistrate that

¶22

W.P.(C).No.1793 of 2007

¶23

¶24

though no proceedings were initiated under the Acts and Rules, the District Collector is imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for each vehicle. If no proceedings have been initiated for the alleged offence, then it is not decipherable as to what power was invoked by the District Collector in imposing such fine on the vehicles. Further no notice was issued to the petitioner and no order was communicated to the petitioner also.

¶25

In fact, when the above writ petition was filed there was an interim order directing the District Collector to issue a copy of the order imposing penalty. The said interim order was passed on 15.01.2007. Government has not filed any counter affidavit and the order has not been produced herein.

¶26

The petitioner was then directed to be granted release of the vehicles by interim order dated 24.01.2007, on payment of the fine, however making the payment subjected to the disposal of the writ petition.

¶27

Since no order have been passed, under the Act of 2001, Ext.P8 is of no consequences. The amounts

¶28

W.P.(C).No.1793 of 2007 3 remitted as per the interim order dated 24.01.2007 shall be immediately refunded to the petitioner. If the same has been paid and the vehicles got released. If not the vehicle shall be released without any fine being remitted. The writ petition is allowed.

¶29

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE

¶30

Joy v. Dist.Collector, Thiruvananthapuram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joy v. Dist.Collector, Thiruvananthapuram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust Vs Government of India

Prasanna Prathapan Vs Secretary ,Gcda

Thazheparamban Muhammed Haji Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

Sabin Vs the District Collector

Vishnu Fuels Vs Union of India

Saju Sebastian Vs the State of Kerala