Disposed

Abdurazak v. the Village Officer

Kerala HC29 Jan 2015WP(C)/1420/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ernakulam directed the Village Officer to accept basic tax and effect mutation for property purchased by the petitioner, subject to compliance with conditions in the predecessors' reclamation permits, disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Village Officer to accept basic tax and effect mutation, requiring the petitioner to produce the judgment copy; allowed authorities to take action if permit conditions are violated.

Abdurazak Vs the Village Officer — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/9TH MAGHA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 1420 of 2015 (B)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

ABDURAZAK, AGED 45 YEARS

¶8

S/O. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, RAMLATH MANZIL, KUZHIMANNA P.O. ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS SMT.P.M.SHAHIDA

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER PORUNNANOOR, MANANTHAVADI TALUK, WYNAD DISTRICT-670645.

¶12

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

¶13

WYNAD DISTRICT-670101.

¶14

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.VINCENT

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

WP(C).No. 1420 of 2015 (B)

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶20

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEED NO.510/2014 OF S.R.O. VELLAMUNDA DATED 26.2.2014.

¶21

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO.1 APPLICATION ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, VELLAMUNDA DATED 26.2.2014.

¶22

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 13.8.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

¶23

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

¶24

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL.

/ TRUE COPY /

P.S. TO JUDGE

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

¶30

W.P.(C)No. 1420 OF 2015

¶31

Dated this the 29^th January, 2015

¶32

J U D G M E N T

¶33

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following

¶34

prayers:

¶35

“i. A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to receive the basic tax of 0.1140 hectors in Re-Survey No.168/7 in Porunnanoor amsom in Karingari desom Mananthawadi Taluk.

¶36

ii. A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the second respondent to dispose of Ext.P3 application after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.

¶37

Iii. Such other relief's as this Honourable Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.”

¶38

The learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that

¶39

the property having an extent of 0.1140 hectors was purchased by the petitioner as per Ext.P1 assignment deed No.510/2014 of SRO, Vellamunda. It is stated that the title is clear and

¶40

¶41

W.P.(C)No. 1420 OF 2015

¶42

absolute. There is no dispute with regard to the said rights or possession in respect of the property. The predecessors-ininterest were enjoying the property, also remitting the tax under the Kerala Land Tax Act. After purchase of the property by the petitioner, he is entitled to remit the tax and enjoy the property in a befitting manner. When the petitioner approached the revenue authorities, the tax was refused to be accepted , which made the petitioner to file Ext.P3 application before the second respondent/District Collector, which is still to be acted upon. It is also stated that transfer of Registry is also still to be made.

¶43

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who points out that the vendors of the property concerned herein had approached the concerned authority and had obtained four different reclamation permits for filling up the land in question, so as to enable them to effect construction of a residential building and thereafter the property was wrongly transferred to the petitioner herein. This is stated as the reason for not accepting the basic tax and for effecting mutation.

¶44

It is not brought to the notice of this Court as to the

¶45

¶46

W.P.(C)No. 1420 OF 2015

¶47

existence of any adverse stipulation or condition at the time of granting reclamation permit to the predecessors-in-interest. There is also no dispute with regard to the flow of title. Conveyance of immovable property is governed by the relevant provisions of the Transfer of Property Act and the property has come to the hands of the petitioner, who is enjoying the same. This being the position, the petitioner is entitled to have the mutation effected in respect of the property concerned in the name of the petitioner and to have the land tax remitted accordingly.

¶48

In the above circumstance, the first respondent/Village Officer is directed to do the needful in the light of the observations as above and to accept basic tax in respect of the property concerned, as and when the same is tendered by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent/Village Officer for further steps. It is also made clear that, if any adverse stipulation is there in the reclamation permit issued to the predecessors-in-

¶49

¶50

W.P.(C)No. 1420 OF 2015

¶51

interest, it is open for the concerned respondent to proceed with appropriate steps in accordance with law, to ensure its

¶52

compliance or to take consequential action for violation, if any.

¶53

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE

¶54

Abdurazak v. the Village Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdurazak v. the Village Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shameer Vs the Sub Inspector of Police, Kottayi Police Station

B.Reghukumar Vs the District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram

T.K.Puravath Vs State of Kerala

Mohammed.M Vs the District Police Chief

Dr.T.R.Chandramohan Vs v.Sureshkumar

Monisha Mohan Vs Central Board of Secondary Education