Disposed

Radhamany Amma v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Jun 2015WP(C)/1159/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in Ernakulam disposed of a writ petition wherein petitioners sought a reconsideration of orders passed on their applications under Section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court directed petitioners to pursue the matter under Section 28A(3) of the Act if desired.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of; petitioners directed to pursue the matter under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Radhamany Amma Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/28TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 1159 of 2012 (T)

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1. RADHAMANY AMMA MANOOR VADKKATHIL, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA PO KOLLAM.

¶8

2. PADMINI AMMA, MANOOR VADAKKATHIL, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA PO KOLLAM.

¶9

3. SHEEJADEVI, KALLUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PANAPPETTI, PORUVAZHY PO SASTAHAMCOTTA , KOLLAM.

¶10

4. KAMALAMMA, NJARAKKATTU VEEDU, VALIYAPADOM, WEST KALLADA KOLLAM.

¶11

5. INDIRAMMA, CHERUKOL VEEDU, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶12

6. GEORGE, S/O.SEBASTIAN, ASSISI HOUSE, KOIVILA PO THEVALAKKARA, KARUNAAPPALLY, KOLLAM.

¶13

7. SULOCHANA, D/O.NARAYANI, THUNDAYATHU, MOTTACKAL THEVALAKKARA, THEVALAKKARA PO, KOLLAM.

¶14

8. ANANDAKUNJUAMMA, KOTTOOR VADAKKATHIL, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA PO KOLLAM.

¶15

9. OMANAYAMMA, RENJITH BHAVAN, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶16

WP(C).No. 1159 of 2012 (T)

¶17

10. RADHAMMA, KALEECKAL KIZHAKKATHIL, THUNDIL KIZHAKKATHIL MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM.

¶18

11. GOURIKUTTY AMMA, NELLIKKUNNATHU VEEDU, VENGAI, MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE VENGAI PO, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶19

12. GOPINATHAN PILLAI, KALEECKAL THEKKADATHU, SANAL BHAVANAM MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM.

¶20

13. VIKRAMAN NAIR, KANIMELAZHIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, MANAKKARA SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM.

¶21

14. SIVASANKARAN UNNITHAN, KOTTOOR KIZHAKKADATHU VEEDU, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶22

15. SAROJINI AMMA, PUTHENVEETTIL, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶23

16. AYYAPPAN ACHARI, VILAYIL VEEDU, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶24

17. BEENA, ALAPPURATHU VEEDU, SOUTH MYNAGAPPALLY, MYNAGAPPALLY KOLLAM.

¶25

18. MINI J, D/O.JAYADAMMAL, ANI NIVAS, MANAKKARA SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM.

¶26

19. CHELLAMMA AMMA, PUTHUVEETTIL, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶27

20. SREEDEVI AMMA, THUNDIL VEEDU, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶28

21. SUBHASHINI AMMA, PULIYANAZHRTHU KIZHAKKATHIL, MANAKKARA , SASTHAMCOTTA KOLLAM.

¶29

BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P

¶30

WP(C).No. 1159 of 2012 (T)

¶31

RESPONDENTS:

¶32

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.

¶33

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM 691 013.

¶34

3. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR LAND ACQUISITION, KUNDARA , KOLLAM 691 501.

¶35

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB

¶36

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶37

DCS

¶38

WP(C).No. 1159 of 2012 (T)

¶39

APPENDIX

¶40

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶41

EXT.P1:	THE COPY OF JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE ADDL.SUB JUDGE, KOLLAM IN LAR NO.185/1984 DATED 15-11-2007.
EXT.P2:	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(a):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(b):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(c):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(d):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(e):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(f):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(g):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(h):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(i):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 10TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(j):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 11TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(k):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 12TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(l):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 13TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(m):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 14TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(n):	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 15TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶42

WP(C).No. 1159 of 2012 (T)

¶43

EXT.P2(o): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 16TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶44

EXT.P2(p): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 17TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶45

EXT.P2(q): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 18TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶46

EXT.P2(r): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 19TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶47

EXT.P2(s): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 20TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶48

EXT.P2(t): TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 21ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶49

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

¶54

W.P.(C). NO. 1159 OF 2012

¶55

Dated this the 18^th day of June, 2015

¶56

JUDGMENT

¶57

The prayer in the writ petition is to consider the applications put in by the petitioners under Section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Government Pleader points out that orders have been passed disposing of Section 28A(1) applications. It is for the petitioners to pursue the matter under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 of they so desire.

¶58

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶59

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

¶60

DCS

Radhamany Amma v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhamany Amma v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

George Kutty Vs Sahadevan

Sajeev M.C Vs Saju George

Mr.E.v.Thomas Vs the K.S.E.B

Travancore Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kerala State Electricity Board

K.M. Lukose Vs the Assistant Engineer

Scaria Jacob Vs the District Collector, Kottayam