Mr.E.v.Thomas v. the K.S.E.B
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 3006 of 2006 (G)
PETITIONER:
E.V.THOMAS, PROPRIETOR,
C'FINE GARMENTS, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD.
2. THE SUB ENGINEER, CENTRAL SECTION,
3. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL SECTION, ERNAKULAM.
R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB
SRI. JAICE JACOB, SC, KSEB
SMT.P.K.RADHIKA-SC, KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). NO. 3006 OF 2006
Dated this the 17th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
E.V.Thomas
The Kerala State Electricity Board
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court