Remanded

K./Murugan v. Union of India

Kerala HC19 Feb 2015WP(C)/1140/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought directions to quash orders regarding environmental clearance for brick earth collection and to mandate permission for mining. The Court avoided merits due to limited relief and directed the Second Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within two months after afording an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd Respondent to consider Ext.P14 and pass orders within two months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

K./Murugan Vs Union of India — Environment and Pollution | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/30TH MAGHA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 1140 of 2015 (N)

¶6

PETITIONER :

¶7

K.MURUGAN, S/O.APPUTTY, AGED 50 YEARS, KAKKADATH HOUSE, CHERUVANNUR P.O., FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.N.SHAMSUL HUDA

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. UNION OF INDIA,

¶11

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

¶12

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST,

¶13

PARIYAVARAN BHAVAN, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD,

¶14

NEW DELHI-110 003.

¶15

2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,

¶16

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

¶17

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,

¶18

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶19

3. GEOLOGIST,

¶20

MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OFFICE,

¶21

CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 020.

¶22

4. DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,

¶23

MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, KESAVADASAPURAM,

¶24

PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.

¶25

R1 BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL

¶26

R2 TO R4 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.VINCENT

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

sts

¶29

WP(C).No. 1140 of 2015 (N)

¶30

APPENDIX

¶31

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶32

EXT.P1.	TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF M/S.STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED.
EXT.P2.	TRUE COPY OF THE TRADE MARK REGISTRATION DATED 11/2/2008 OF M/S.STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED UNDER SECTION 23(2), FROM THE TRADE MARKS REGISTRY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
EXT.P3.	TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE DATED 24/12/2013 VALID UP TO 31/12/2014 ISSUED TO M/S. STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS UNDER THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXT.P4.	TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION DATED 10/8/2007 OBTAINED BY M/S.STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED UNDER THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX RULES.
EXT.P5.	TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT NO.PCB/KKD/DO/IOC/2082/2011 DATED 2/12/2011 VALID UP TO 30/11/2014 ISSUED BY THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD.
EXT.P6	TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE GENERAL MANAGER OF M/S. STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED PERTAINING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER AS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
EXT.P7.	TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.19/11-12/M.M/B.C/D.O.Z/M. - 359/2011 DATED 18/5/2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXT.P8.	TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.34/11-12/M.M./B.C/D.O.Z/M. - 2110/2011 DATED 8/3/2012 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXT.P8(A).	TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.49/13-14/M.M./B.C/D.O.Z/M. - 2350/2012 DATED 3/4/2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXT.P9.	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12/2/2014 SUBMITTED BY M/S.STANDARD TILE & CLAY (PRIVATE) LIMITED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXT.P10.	TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOTIFICATION 2006, ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS PER S.O.NO.1533 DATED 14/9/2006, PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DATED 14/9/2006.
EXT.P11.	TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 24/6/2013 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

2/-

sts

-2-

WP(C).NO.1140/2015

¶37

EXT.P11(A). TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.J-13012/12/2013-IA-II(I) DATED 24/12/2013 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶38

EXT.P12. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.7935/M2/2013 DATED 21/3/2014 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT

¶39

EXT.P13. TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.D.O.Z/M.745/14 DATED 27/3/2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

¶40

EXT.P14. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10/5/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶41

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO.JUDGE

sts

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

¶47

W.P(C). No. 1140 of 2015

¶48

Dated this the 19^th day of February, 2015

¶49

J U D G M E N T

¶50

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following

¶51

prayers:

¶52

“i. issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction quashing Ext.P12 order of the 4^th respondent and Ext.P13 proceeding of the 3^rd respondent;

¶53

ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction commanding the 3^rd respondent to re-consider Ext.P9 application and to issue the necessary permission for the collection of brick earth for the purpose of M/s. Standard Tile & Clay Works (Private) Limited;

¶54

iii. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that no environmental clearance is required for the collection of brick earth from an area of less than 5 hectares, as insisted in Exts.P10, P11 and P11(a), and hence the condition insisted by the 4^th respondent in Ext.P12 is erroneous and unsustainable in law;

¶55

iv. Issue such other writ, order or direction which may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶56

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the

¶57

grievance of the petitioner has already been projected by way of

¶58

WP(c). No.1140 of 2015

¶59

¶60

Ext.P14 before the 2^nd respondent and that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the said respondent to have it considered and finalized within a reasonable time.

¶61

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

¶62

In view of the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go through the merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and pas appropriate orders on Ext.P14, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It shall be done, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶63

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2^nd respondent for further steps.

¶64

Sd/-

¶65

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

¶66

K./Murugan v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K./Murugan v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.K.Raju Vs State of Kerala

Officers' Club Vs State of Kerala

Gladison Vs Secretary

S. Shanmugavel Vs District Collector, Idukki District

Asifa Beevi Vs State of Kerala

Hamzakutty C Vs the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs