Disposed

Ayyoob v. the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway

Kerala HC4 Dec 2015WP(C)/11378/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

"This bench, noting a Division Bench judgment establishing an internal waiver procedure for demurrage charges, closed the writ petition by directing the petitioner to avail of the stated grievance redressal mechanism."

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to apply for waiver of demurrage charges under the procedure outlined in the Division Bench judgment.

Ayyoob Vs the Senior Divisional Commercial… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No.11378 of 2012 (V)

¶6

PETITIONER :

¶7

P.K.AYYOOB, PROPRIETOR, AYYOOB & COMPANY, EDAMUTTAM, TRICHUR-680001.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.K.R.AVINASH

¶9

RESPONDENTS :

¶10

THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM-695011.

¶11

THE STATION MASTER, OLLUR RAILWAY STATION, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRICHUR-680306.

¶12

THE CHIEF GOODS SUPERVISOR, OLLUR RAILWAY STATION, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRICHUR-680306.

¶13

R1 BY ADV. SRI.JAMES KURIAN, SC, RAILWAYS BY SRI.C.S.DIAS,SC, RAILWAYS

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No.11378 of 2012 (V)

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :-

¶18

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RAILWAY RECEIPT FOR THE CONSIGNMENT OF THE CEMENT.

¶19

EXHIBIT P2: RELEVANT PAGE OF MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 15.5.2012.

¶20

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RAKE CIRCULAR No.74/2005 ISSUED BY THE MINSTRY OF RAILWAYS.

¶21

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.5.2012.

¶22

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF PARA 1708 OF CHAPTER 17 OF INDIAN RAILWAY COMMERCIAL MANUAL.

¶23

EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE CLARIFICATION ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF RAILWAY DATED 20.1.2011.

¶24

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :- NIL.

¶25

True copy

¶26

P.A to Judge

¶27

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.

¶28

W.P.(C)No.11378 of 2012

¶29

Dated this the 4^th day of December, 2015

¶30

JUDGMENT

¶31

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following

¶32

reliefs:-

¶33

(i) Declare that petitioner is not liable to pay demurrage charges for the period between arrival of the wagon as per Exhibit.P1 and commencement of unloading of the wagon as the delay due to reasons beyond the control of petitioner.

¶34

(ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other Writ directing respondents to unload the wagons of the rake placed for unloading as per Ext.P1 without insisting demurrage charges for the period between arrival of the wagon on 14.5.2012 and placement of wagons for unloading.

¶35

(iii) grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper as on the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶36

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶37

Standing Counsel for the Railways.

¶38

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, it was

¶39

submitted by both sides that the matter in issue has been

¶40

W.P.(C).No.11378 of 2012

¶41

¶42

considered by a Division Bench of this Court in intra court appeals,

¶43

i.e., WA No.917/2014 and connected cases. A certified copy of the judgment dated 03.09.2014 in the aforesaid writ appeals was made

¶44

available for perusal. The writ appeals were disposed of as under:

¶45

“(1) The writ petitioners are permitted to make an application for waiver before the Station Manager/Goods Supervisor within 30 (thirty) days from today giving all details along with reasons and relevant records as necessary.

¶46

(2) Station Master/Goods Supervisor shall forward the application for waiver of demurrage charges to the Divisional Officer with his remark within 15 (fifteen) days of receipt of the application.

¶47

(3) The Divisional officer shall take a decision on the waiver application considering the reasons and circumstances given by the writ petitioners in the waiver application. Consequential orders be issued thereafter. In case the writ petitioners are aggrieved by the said decision, they can prefer appeal to the higher authority.”

¶48

In the light of the above, the writ petition is closed, permitting the petitioner to move as per the aforesaid direction.

¶49

Sd/-

¶50

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE

¶51

skj

¶52

True copy

¶53

P.A to Judge

Ayyoob v. the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyoob v. the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vadayam Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangam LTD.NO.D.170(D) Vs the Kozhikode District Co-Operative Bank

K.Shihabudeen Vs Vallappuzha Grama Panchayath

Said Mustafa Vs Puduppariyaram Grama Panchayath

Viju Associates Vs the Union of India, Ministry of Railways

Asokan v. Vs Kerala State Electricity Board

M/S.M & T Polymers Vs the Secretary, Mudakuzha Grama Panchayath