Chandrika v. Valappil Valsala
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel could not procure instructions. Judgment delivered on 19-11-2015.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937
SA.No. 595 of 2000 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN AS 152/1998 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 08-06-2000
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS 545/1995 of ADDL. MUNNSIFF'S COURT, KOZHIKODE-I DATED 30-05-1998
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
KALATHUMTHODIKAYIL CHANDRIKA, AGED 62, D/O.CHEKKUTTY, ELATHUR AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN SMT.MARY ANNE JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFF:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kalathumthodikayil Chandrika
- respondent
Valappil Valsala
- respondent
Nayarani Valappil
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court