Raji.K.R v. Aneesh M.A
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner aggrieved by non-release of compensation cheque due to lawyer identification issues. High Court directed Second MACT to release cheque upon petitioner producing proper ID proof.
What did the court decide?
Directing the Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kasaragod to release the cheque on production of proper ID proof by the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/25TH JYAISHTA, 1937
OP (MAC).No. 80 of 2015 (O)
IN OPMV 54/2012 of IIND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KASARAGOD
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
RAJI K.R., D/O.LATE RAJAN K.K, KATTIPOYIL, CHITTARIKKAL AMSOM, KAMBALLOOR DESOM, KAMBALLOOR P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMNATH (E).
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner must produce proper ID proof to collect the compensation cheque ordered by the MACT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raji K.R.
- respondent
The New India Assurance Company Limited
Coram
A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court