Allowed

Jamsheera v. the National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Kerala HC17 Mar 2015MACA/290/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the appeal in part, modifying the compensation award. The Court enhanced the sums awarded for pain and sufferings, loss of amenities, and extra nourishment, and directed interest at 9% per annum instead of the Tribunal's 6%. No specific statutes were cited.

What did the court decide?

Compensation increased by Rs. 15,000; interest rate modified to 9% per annum.

Jamsheera Vs the National Insurance Co. Ltd. — Motor Accident Claims | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936

¶5

MACA.No. 290 of 2015 (E)

¶6

O.P.(MV)NO. 1674/2002 OF THE PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE

¶7

APPELLANT/PETITIONER :-

¶8

JAMSHEERA, D/O.ABDUL LATHEEF, RESIDING AT VALIYAKATH HOUSE, CHANDUKANDY PARAMBA, MEENCHANTHA RAILWAY GATE, ARAKINAR (PO), KOZHIKODE.

¶9

BY ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI

¶10

RESPONDENT :-

¶11

THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., P.B.NO.811, NOOR COMPLEX, MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

¶12

BY ADVS. SRI.P.G.GANAPPAN SRI.M.A.GEORGE

¶13

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

rkj

¶15

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J

¶16

-----------------------------------

¶17

M.A.C.A.No.290 of 2015

¶18

----------------------------------- Dated this the 17^th day of March, 2015

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

The claimant in a petition for compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has come up in this appeal challenging the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal.

¶21

The claimant was a student at the time of accident. The accident took place on 16.03.2002. The claimant was aged 11 years old. A sum of ₹ 1,00,000/- was claimed in the petition by way of compensation. The Tribunal, on an appraisal of the materials on record, found that the claimant is entitled to only a sum of ₹18,508/- and accordingly, an award was passed for the said amount. As the vehicle involved in the accident was covered by a valid insurance policy at the time of accident, the insurer was directed to satisfy the award. The claimant is aggrieved by the said award.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel for the claimant and the learned counsel for the insurer.

¶23

M.A.C.A.No.290 of 2015

¶24

¶25

As noticed above, the claimant was 11 years old at the time of accident. She was examined before the Tribunal as PW1. The Tribunal found from the evidence tendered by the claimant that she sustained fracture of both bones of her right leg in the accident and she was under treatment at Asoka Hospital, Calicut. Plaster was applied on her initially at the said hospital. The Tribunal also found that the claimant was discharged later from the Asoka Hospital, Calicut and admitted in the Medical College Hospital, Calicut and plaster was again applied. Ext.A2 is a wound certificate issued to the claimant from the Medical College Hospital, Calicut. The Tribunal has granted a sum of 8,000/- to the₹ claimant towards compensation for pain and sufferings. In the nature of the injuries sustained by the claimant and the treatment undergone by her, I am of the view that the claimant is entitled to a further sum of 7,000/- towards₹ compensation for pain and sufferings. Since no compensation is awarded for continuing disability, I am of the view that the claimant has to be adequately compensated under the head loss of amenities and enjoyments in life. Only a sum of 3,000/- is seen granted₹

¶26

M.A.C.A.No.290 of 2015

¶27

¶28

by the Tribunal to the claimant towards compensation of loss of amenities and enjoyment in life. In the nature of the injuries sustained by the claimant and the treatment undergone by her, I am of the view that the claimant is entitled to a further sum of 5,000/- towards loss of₹ amenities and enjoyments in life. No compensation is seen granted to the claimant towards extra nourishment. According to me, the claimant is entitled to a sum of ₹3,000/- towards extra nourishment as well. Thus, the claimant is entitled to a further sum of 15,000/-₹ towards compensation.

¶29

It is seen that interest has been granted by the Tribunal for the compensation awarded only at the rate of 6% per annum. It is now settled that the claimant in a proceedings of this nature is entitled to interest for the compensation awarded at the rate of 9% per annum.

¶30

6. In the result, the appeal is allowed in part. The compensation granted by the Tribunal is modified granting a further sum of Rs.15,000/- to the claimant by way of compensation. Needless to say, the claimant will be entitled to interest for the whole amount of compensation at the rate of

¶31

M.A.C.A.No.290 of 2015

¶32

¶33

9% per annum, except for the period of delay in filing the appeal, viz., 2699 days as ordered in C.M.Application No.327 of 2015.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE

¶36

rkj

¶37

//TRUE COPY//

¶38

P.A. TO JUDGE

Jamsheera v. the National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamsheera v. the National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesan Vs Sree Narayana Probodha Chandrodaya Yogam (Snpc Yogam)

Fact Managerial Staff House Construction Co-Op.Society Ltd. Vs Subaida(Died)

Abdul Rasheed Vs Aboobacker and Another

Sukumaran Vs Vijayalakshmi

The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs P. Gangadharan

Anil Kumar Vs Pradeep