P.P. Raman v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a criminal revision petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to pay specified costs and cure defects within granted timelines, with no representation appearing before the court.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision petition No. 1311 of 2002 is dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to comply with previous orders regarding costs and curing defects.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/20TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1311 of 2002
CRL.A 105/2000 of ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, FAST TRACK COURT NO.I, PALAKKAD
CC 259/1995 of J.M.F.C.-III, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
P.P.RAMAN, S/o.KORU, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, EDATHARA P.O., PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SUNIL SMT.S.CHITHRA SRI.ROY THOMAS (M) SRI.P.BIJU SRI.TOMY LUKOSE SMT.USHA MENON SRI.SUMITH.P.PRASAD SRI.ARUN.C.ROY SRI.DIPU.R SRI.THOMAS SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.P.Raman
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
M/s. Oasis Chits and Investments Pallipuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court