Allowed

Mansoor Ahmed v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC5 Jun 2015Bail Appl./7179/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. criminalizing cheating, criminal conspiracy, and price chits offenses. Since the public prosecutor raised no objection and similar accused received bail, the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail on 20,000 rupees bond with standard reporting and non-interference conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on executing a bond of Rs. 20,000 each with two solvent sureties, to surrender within ten days and report to the Investigating Officer fortnightly for six months.

Mansoor Ahmed Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 7179 of 2014

¶6

CRIME NO. 800/CR/EOW-1/KLM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED :

¶8

1. MANSOOR AHMED, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. BASHEER, NAVAROJ PURAYUIDOM,

¶9

LAJNAD WARD, ALAPPUZHA.

¶10

2. REMYA, AGED 31 YEARS,

¶11

D/O. VIJAYAN, KALLAYIL HOUSE,

¶12

KANJANI P.O., THRISSUR.

¶13

3. SHERIN, AGED 31 YEARS,

¶14

S/O. SHANMUGHAN, POYYARA HOUSE,

¶15

KANJANI P.O., THRISSUR.

¶16

4. SOUMYA P.S., AGED 29 YEARS,

¶17

D/O. SHANMUGHAN, POYYARA HOUSE,

¶18

VELLATTU LANE, ANJALY B-1,

¶19

THIRUVAMBADY, THRISSUR.

¶20

5. BAIJU B.S., AGED 49 YEARS,

¶21

S/O. SASIMUKAN, KOTTAYIL HOUSE,

¶22

CHARAMANGALAM, MAYITHARA P.O.,

¶23

CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA.

¶24

6. PREMLAL, AGED 35 YEARS,

¶25

S/O. PRAKASAN, PARUVACKAL HOUSE,

¶26

T.V.PURAM P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM.

¶27

BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN

¶28

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE :

¶29

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 030. (CRIME NO.800/CR/EOW-1/KLM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SUB UNIT).

¶30

--2--

¶31

--2--

¶32

Bail Appl..No. 7179 of 2014

¶33

2. CBCID, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SUB UNIT. (CRIME NO.800/CR/EOW-1/KLM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SUB UNIT), PIN-695 004.

¶34

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN

¶35

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶36

mbr/

¶37

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

¶38

B.A. No. 7179 of 2014

¶39

Dated this the 05^th day of June, 2015

¶40

ORDER

¶41

The petitioners are accused numbers 1 to 4, 7, 8 and 19

¶42

in Crime No. 800/CR/EOW-I/KLM registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 506 Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Price Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act.

¶43

The petitioners have filed this petition praying for a relief under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶44

Heard.

¶45

The learned Public Prosecutor has no serious objection

¶46

in allowing this petition. It has been submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that some other accused, who had approached this Court, had been granted the relief under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that some of the accused persons had been already granted relief under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by this Court, I am inclined to grant the same relief to the petitioners as well, as the petitioners are also similarly placed.

¶47

B.A. No. 7179 of 2014

¶48

¶49

In the result, this bail application stands allowed and the respondents are directed to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 800/CR/EOW-I/KLM on condition of each of the petitioners executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) each, with two solvent sureties each, each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the second respondent, before whom the petitioners shall surrender within ten days from this day and subject to the following further conditions.

¶50

(1) The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Monday between 9.00 and 11.00 a.m for six months or till the filing of the final report, whichever is earlier.

¶51

(2) The petitioners shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses or in any way tamper with the investigation.

¶52

(3) The petitioners shall not get involved in any offence during the pendency of the crime.

¶53

(4) The petitioners shall deposit their passport, if any, with the arresting officer simultaneously at the time of arrest or file an affidavit.

¶54

B.A. No. 7179 of 2014

¶55

¶56

In the event of surrender of passport by the petitioners before the Investigating Officer, the Investigating Officer shall

¶57

without delay produce the same before the Court.

¶58

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

¶59

JUDGE

¶60

DMR/-

Mansoor Ahmed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mansoor Ahmed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunilkumar T.S. Vs the Circle Inspector of Police

Anto Jacob K. Vs State of Kerala

Sunny Vs State of Kerala

Siby G. John Vs State of Kerala

Mansoor Ahamed Vs State of Kerala

Rezeena Vs State of Kerala