Dismissed

R.Vasu v. State of Kerala & 3 Others

Kerala HC28 Jul 2015CRL.A/2298/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal appeal against an acquittal in a cheque dishonour case was dismissed because the appellant failed to obtain the correct addresses of the respondents and give them notice, despite repeated court directions, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter further.

What did the court decide?

The criminal appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution following the appellant's failure to comply with directions to furnish correct addresses and give notice to respondents.

R.Vasu Vs State of Kerala & 3 Others — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2015/6TH SRAVANA, 1937

¶5

CRL.A.No. 2298 of 2006 ( )

¶6

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 66/2000 of J.M.F.C.-II, HARIPAD DATED 0305-2006

¶7

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Crl.L.P. 512/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-11-2006

¶8

APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT::

¶9

R. VASU, S/O.KUNJURAMAN, PROPRIETOR S.N. THEATRE, HARIPAD PATTAKULANGAR MADATHIL, THULAPPARAMPU, THEKKUM MURIYIL HARIPAD VILLAGE.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.R.REJI

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & ACCUSED::

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM.

¶13

TAJ RELEASE, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

JAMAL, MANAGING PARTNER, TAJ RELEASE, AMAL COMPLEX, C.P. UMMER ROAD ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-35.

¶15

VINOD @ VIVEK, PARTNSER, TAJ RELEASE, DO. DO.

¶16

BY PP SMT SEENA RAMAKRISHNAN

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-072015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

P.D.RAJAN, J

¶19

Crl. A.No. 2298 of 2006

¶20

....................................... Dated 28^th July, 2015

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

This appeal is preferred against the judgment of acquittal in C.C.No.66 of 2000 of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Haripad which was filed under Section 138 of N.I.Act. After trial, the accused in the above case was acquitted by the trial court. Against that, appellant preferred this appeal obtaining special leave. After admission, this court directed the appellant to give notice to respondents 2 to 4. On 21.8.2012, notice was issued to respondents 2 to 4 through C.I of Police, Ernakulam North in which it is reported that the firm is not working in that place and the parties could not be traced out. After that information, this court directed the appellant to furnish the correct address of respondents 2 to 4 and to give notice to them. No attempt was made by the appellant so far and he is not interested in prosecuting the matter even after directions issued on 5.12.2012. In the circumstances, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

¶23

P.D.RAJAN, JUDGE

¶24

lgk

R.Vasu v. State of Kerala & 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vasu v. State of Kerala & 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Hafees Vs Saihabudeen

P.K.Viswambaran Vs State of Kerala

M.G.Suresh Vs Sivarajan

Mubarack Vs Saji & State

R.v.Sanal Kumar Vs P.Prem Kumar

P.Abdul Nazer Vs K.Babu