Davis K.J v. Aravindhakshan
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court case was closed after the time for disposing of the underlying suit was extended on the administrative side, with liberty to move afresh if needed.
What did the court decide?
contempt of court case closed with liberty to move afresh if needed
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/27TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 350 of 2015 (S) IN O.P.(C).NO.1413/2014
-------------------------------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.(C).NO.1413/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 25-06-2014
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN OPC:
DAVIS K.J, AGED 55 YEARS S/O OUSEPH, KOLENCHERY HOUSE, NETTINAMPILLY MANICKAMANGALAM P.O., KALADY.
BY ADV. SRI.AYPE JOSEPH
RESPONDENT:
ARAVINDHAKSHAN, AGED 50 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER LEARNED MUNSIFF, MUNSIFF COURT ALUVA ALUVA POST OFFICE, PIN:683101.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DAVIS K.J
- respondent
ARAVINDHAKSHAN
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court