This is a contempt case dismissing the petitioner's liability based on a prior Division Bench decision in Writ Appeal No.1746/2014 which resolved the underlying matter.
The contempt case is dismissed against the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/16TH CHAITHRA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 183 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).30960/2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30960/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 02.12.2014
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C) :
S.AJAYAKUMAR AGED 52 YEARS
S/O.SREEDHARAN, PROPRIETOR, SREELAKSHMI RESIDENCY ELIPPAKULAM P.O., CHOONAD, VALLIKUNNAM ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2 :
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
R BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.TOM K THOMAS
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 183 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).30960/2014
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2.12.2014 IN WP(C).NO.30960/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A TO JUDGE
AV
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
------------------------------------ Cont.Case (C) No.183 of 2015
Dated this the 6th day of April, 2015
J U D G M E N T
In view of the Division Bench decision of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1746/2014, this Contempt Case is dismissed.
Sd/-
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.
AV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is liable for contempt after the Division Bench disposed of the underlying Writ Petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Appeal No.1746/2014Followed¶30
S.AJAYAKUMAR
DR.W.R.REDDY
ANIL.X
K.SURENDRA MOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
K.SURENDRA MOHAN
Parties & counsel
