P.B.Indira Devi v. Abdul Kareem
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case (C) No. 1112 of 2015, the High Court of Kerala closed the proceeding after the respondent produced an order complying with the underlying judgment, leaving open the remedy to challenge that compliance order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1112 of 2015 (S)
----------------------------------------------JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.3464/2015 DATED 13-03-2015.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
P.B. INDIRA DEVI, AGED 57 YEARS, W/O.U.K. VIJAYAKUMAR, UTTUMADATHIL HOUSE, P.O. KAIPARAMB, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
ABDUL KAREEM, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER CUM SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR- 680 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether the contempt order should be closed while leaving open the remedy to challenge the underlying order
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.B. INDIRA DEVI
- respondent
ABDUL KAREEM
Coram
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court