K.Dhushyanthan v. Saju.D
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case where the respondent alleged compliance with a previous order by issuing a cheque, the court noted the lack of rebuttal and considered further steps unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
The Petitioner did not rebut the Respondent's allegation of compliance; the Contempt of Court case is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/2ND CHAITHRA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2015 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27875/2013 DATED 25-08-2014
PETITIONER(S) :
1. K.DHUSHYANTHAN, AGED 64 YEARS
- S/O. KUNJACHAN, PUTHEN PARAMBIL, PERUMPALLI
- VALIYAZHEEKKAL P.O., (VIA) KANDALLOOR
- KAYAMKULAM.
- (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Dhushyanthan and others
- respondent
Saju D.
Coram
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court