Radhakrishnan.M. v. Adila Abdulla
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the respondent submitted that the court's earlier direction had been complied with regarding the vehicle's release. The Court ordered the closure of the contempt case accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court Case stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 272 of 2015 (S)
---------------------------------WPC 4671/2015 OF THIS HIGH COURT
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :-:
RADHAKRISHNAN.M., AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAN, MUNNARA HOUSE, VETTOM, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:-:
------------------------------------------------
ADILA ABDULLA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Radhakrishnan.M.
- respondent
Adila Abdullah
Coram
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court