The Hon'ble Court observed that directions in the underlying judgment had been complied with and dismissed the Contempt of Court case, closing the proceedings without substantive reasoning.
The contempt proceedings were dismissed as the directions in the underlying judgment were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 1061 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).3390/2010
----------------------------------------------------WP(C) 3390/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24-09-2012
PETITIONER:
V.K.BALACHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.DAMODARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, P.O. PERIYA, MULLIYAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI
RESPONDENTS:
R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL,SC,CO-OP.EMP.PENSION BOARD R1 BY ADV. SMT.HEMALATHA
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB BY SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CO(C) NO. 1061/2013
APPENDIX
ANNEXURE A1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 3390/2010 DATED 24.09.2012.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
CONTEMPT CASE(C) NO. 1061 OF 2013
Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The directions in the judgment have since been complied with. It is upto the petitioner to challenge the consequential proceedings appropriately.
The Contempt Case is closed.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
ncd
V.K.Balachandran Nair
P.K.Vinod Kumar
Mohammed Faizy
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
