Sangeetha v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In a Section 438 Cr.P.C. bail application regarding a suicide case, the Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail noting doubt about Section 306 IPC applicability.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail pending the execution of a bond Rs.25,000- with two sureties and compliance with undertaking conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Bail Appl..No.578 of 2015
CRIME NO.1306/2014 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION,TRISSUR.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:
SANGEETHA,AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.RADHAKRISHNAN,KOMBATH VEEDU, V ASUPURAM DESOM,MATTATHUR VILLAGE.
BY ADV.SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite a prior rejection under special circumstances.
Whether Section 306 IPC is attracted when the petitioner was a debtor and the creditor committed suicide.
Whether subsequent failure to repay a chitty amount justifies criminal liability for suicide.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SANGEETHA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court