Allowed

Ranjith v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Jun 2015Bail Appl./1426/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who was accused of outrage of modesty, cheating, obtaining by deceit, and criminal intimidation. The court noted suspicious circumstances in the case diary.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation by executing a bond with two sureties and adhering to conditions against tampering evidence or harassment.

Ranjith Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1426 of 2015 ()

¶6

------------------------------(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT)

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER :

¶8

RANJITH, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHANAN THAMBI, PUTHEN VEEDU, KALADY KARA, KALADY VILLAGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM.

¶9

BY ADVS.SMT.R.LEELA

¶10

SMT.U.S.SARITHA

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

¶12

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

¶13

2. ANNAMMA JAMES,

¶14

PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE, S.PURAM P.O., KURICHI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN - 686 532.

¶15

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

sts

¶18

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

¶19

----------------------

¶20

Bail Appl. No.1426 of 2015

¶21

Dated this the 1^st day of June 2015

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

¶24

The petitioner is alleged to have committed

¶25

the offences under Secs.354, 406, 420 and 506 of Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner took the first informant in a car and outraged her modesty. The co-accused received from her cash and gold ornaments together valued at Rs.3,61,000/-. He failed to return the amount and the gold ornaments.

¶26

Heard both sides.

¶27

I have perused the letter written by the first

¶28

informant to the Dy.S.P., Aluva which finds a place in the case diary. There are some suspicious circumstances in the case. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner.

¶29

In the result this bail application is allowed.

¶30

The petitioner shall be released on bail after

¶31

interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only)

¶32

Bail Appl. No.1426 of 2015 2

¶33

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with

¶34

this case.

¶35

He shall appear before the Investigating

¶36

Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

¶37

He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

¶38

He shall not harass the defacto

¶39

complainant or her relatives.

¶40

In case of violation of any of the above conditions,

¶41

the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

¶42

Sd/-

¶43

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW

JUDGE

/ True Copy /

P.A. To Judge

Ranjith v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjith v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sibeesh K.S. Vs State of Kerala

Manoj P Vs Stat Eof Kerala

Sanalkumar Vs State of Kerala

Sangeetha Vs State of Kerala

Alwin Basil Jose Vs State of Kerala

K.Abdulla Vs State of Kerala