Murphy E.S v. the SHO
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala allowed an application for anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of cruelty, assault and outrage of modesty, restricting no possibility of family reconciliation.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is released on bail upon execution of a bond with two sureties and adherence to specific conditions, particularly not harassing the complainant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2015/1ST JYAISHTA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 525 of 2015 ()
CRIME NO. 1566/2014 OF POOYAPALLY POLICE STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT
PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:
MURPHY E.S., AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.N.P.SASEENDRAN, EDAPARAMBIL, C.M.C. -2, VELOORVATTAM, P.O.CHERTHALA, DIST ALAPPUZHA-688 524.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SHO, POOYAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-689 627.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case alleging cruelty, assault and outrage of modesty.
Whether to grant bail on conditions given the family harmony prospects.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murphy E.S.
- respondent
The SHO, Pooypally Police Station
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court