Allowed

Aneesha v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC21 May 2015Bail Appl./1502/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed an application for anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to petitioners accused of various offences including outrage of modesty and assault, based on lack of serious injury to the victim.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond for Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, appearance for interrogation, and conditions against tampering with evidence and harassing the

Aneesha Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2015/31ST VAISAKHA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1502 of 2015 ()

¶6

CRIME NO. 66/2015 OF POTHENCODE POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:-

¶8

1. ANEESHA,D/O.BABY, AGED 22 YEARS, SUNI BHAVAN, TALAMCODE, VAVARAMBALAM, KEEZHTHONNAKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶9

*2. ANILKUMAR,S/O.BABY,AGED 27 YEARS,

¶10

SUNI BHAVAN, TALAMCODE, VAVARAMBALAM, KEEZHTHONNAKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (CORRECTED)

¶11

*ANOOP, S/O.PRABHAKARAN NAIR,AGED 26 YEARS, THOTTUMPURA, CHARUVILA PUTHENVEEDU, VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶12

*THE NAME OF THE 2ND PETITIONER IS CORRECTED AS PER ORDER DATED 21/05/2015 IN CRL.M.A.NO.3255/2015

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A

¶14

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:-

¶15

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

¶16

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

sts

¶19

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

¶20

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.1502 of 2015

¶21

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21^st day of May, 2015

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶24

The petitioners are alleged to have committed the

¶25

offences under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 354 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

The allegation is that they assaulted the victim and outraged her modesty. It is submitted that the police have registered a case against the victim and others also, Crime No.65/2015. The prosecution has no case that the victim sustained any serious injuries. Having regard to these facts I am inclined to grant the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶27

In the result, this application is allowed.

¶28

The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs.Twenty five thousand only each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if they are arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

¶29

The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if they are so required by him in writing.

¶30

The petitioners shall not destroy or tamper with

B.A. No.1502 of 2015

evidence.

The petitioners shall not harass the defacto complainant or their relatives. They shall cooperate with the investigation.

¶35

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

¶36

sd/-

¶37

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE

¶38

R.AV

¶39

//True Copy//

¶40

PA to Judge

Aneesha v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aneesha v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Bindu Vs State of Kerala

Eldho Mathai Vs State of Kerala

Nithin Jose Vs State of Kerala

Nishanth Vs State of Kerala

Anilkumar Vs State of Kerala

Priji P Vs State of Kerala