Allowed

Sreekandan Nair v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC4 Sept 2015Bail Appl./5003/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted bail to the 13th accused in an FIR regarding killing wild elephants and tusk smuggling under the Kerala Wild Life Protection Act. Bail was granted with strict conditions including report to IO, no leaving Kerala, and no interference with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, subject to eight strict conditions including reporting, non-interference, and no movement outside Kerala.

Sreekandan Nair Vs State of Kerala — Narcotics (NDPS) | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/13RD BHADRA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5003 of 2015 ()

¶6

OR NO. 3/2015 OF KARIMPANI FOREST STATION, KRUPPAMPADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

¶7

PETITIONER/13TH ACCUSED:-:

¶8

-------------------------------------------

¶9

SREEKANDAN NAIR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.VELAPPAN NAIR, SREEVARAHAM HOUSE, CHEPPIL LANE, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.BREJITHA UNNIKRISHNAN

¶11

RESPONDENT :

¶12

--------------------

¶13

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682 031.

¶14

BY MR. TOM JOSE PADINJAREKARA ADGP

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

¶18

Bail Appl. No.5003 of 2015

¶19

Dated this the 4^th day of September 2015

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Petitioner filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.

¶22

Petitioner is the 13^th accused in O.R. No.3 of

¶23

2015 of Karimbany Forest Station registered for the offences under Secs.9, 2(2), 2(16), 2(20), 2(36), 2(37), 39, 48(a), 49, 50, 51 and 57 of the Kerala Wild Life Protection Act. The prosecution case is that the petitioner along with the co-accused trespassed into a reserve forest, armed with guns and shot wild elephants with a view to remove the tusks. Other accused persons who are traders in tusks received it knowing that it is an illegal activity and committed the offences mentioned above.

¶24

The allegation against the petitioner is that

¶25

he was found along with the 12^th accused who is suspected to be the main culprit in the case.

¶26

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶27

and the learned Additional Director General of Prosecution.

¶28

Bail Appl. No.5003 of 2015 2

¶29

Learned counsel submitted that there is no overt act alleged against the petitioner.

¶30

Learned Additional Director General of

¶31

Prosecution opposed the bail application contending that the investigation has not been completed. The government is seriously considering about the handing over of the investigation to the CBI as the accused have interstate connections.

¶32

Considering the stage of investigation, bail is granted to the petitioner with the following strict conditions.

¶33

i. The petitioner shall be released on

¶34

bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kuruppampady.

¶35

ii. The sureties shall produce documents to prove their identity and solvency.

¶36

Bail Appl. No.5003 of 2015 3

¶37

iii. The learned Magistrate need not insist on solvency certificate but there must be sufficient documents to reveal the identity and solvency of the sureties.

¶38

iv. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. on every Mondays and Thursdays until final report is filed.

¶39

v. The petitioner shall surrender his passport if any before the learned Magistrate or if he does not have the one, file an affidavit to that effect.

¶40

vi. The petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses nor shall he meddle with the investigation in any manner.

¶41

vii. The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without obtaining permission from the learned Magistrate.

¶42

viii. The petitioner shall not involve in any

¶43

Bail Appl. No.5003 of 2015 4

¶44

other offence during the period of bail.

¶45

In case of violation of any of the above

¶46

conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this Court.

¶47

Sd/-

¶48

A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE

¶49

¶50

/ True Copy / P.A. To Judge

Sreekandan Nair v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sreekandan Nair v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shino Mathew Vs State of Kerala

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Kerala

P.K. Thomas Vs Cbcid, Kozhikode

Romin Alby Vs State of Kerala

Lakshmanan Vs State of Kerala

Romin Alby Vs State of Kerala