The High Court of Kerala dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the accused had already been arrested by the time the application was admitted.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous as accused was already arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 4606 of 2015 ()
-----------------------------
CRIME NO. 587/2015 OF ALAKODE POLICE STATION , KANNUR.
PETITIONER /ACCUSED NO.2:
------------------------
SHINO MATHEW, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, PULLATTU HOUSE, KARUVANCHAL P.O., ALAKKODU, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL. SRI.N.P.MAHABOOB.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
-----------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
amk
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
B.A No.4606 of 2015
Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2015.
O R D E R
Application for bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
has become infructuous. Hence, this bail application is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
//True copy//
P.A to Judge
amk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed for arrest before the issue of anticipatory bail should be allowed as the Accused has already been arrested.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHINO MATHEW
STATE OF KERALA
A. HARIPRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
