Dismissed

M.Thulaseedharan @ Kutty v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC9 Jun 2015Bail Appl./2435/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala dismissed the petitioner's bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court found that prima facie evidence supported the prosecution version of assault with an iron rod, theft, and property damage, concluding it was improper to grant anticipatory bail at this stage.

What did the court decide?

No relief; the petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed and the petitioner was not granted bail.

M.Thulaseedharan @ Kutty Vs State of Kerala — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2435 of 2015

¶6

CRIME NO.233/2015 OF AYIROOR POLICE STATION.

¶7

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

¶8

M.THULASEEDHARAN @ KUTTY, AGED 56, S/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI, THUNDATHIL VEEDU, MANTHARA, EDAVA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAJENDRAN NAIR

¶10

SMT.M.SANTHY

¶11

RESPONDENT:

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

*ADDL. R2 IMPLEADED

¶14

2. RAKESH SURENDRAN, AGED 31, S/O.SURENDRAN, ANANDAVILASOM, EDAVA.P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 311.

¶15

ADDL. R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 09.06.2015 IN IA.4281/2015.

¶16

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA.R. ADDL R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

mbr/

¶19

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

¶20

----------------------

¶21

Bail Appl. No.2435 of 2015 -------------------------------------------Dated this the 9^th day of June 2015

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

¶24

Petitioner is the 1^st accused in Crime No.233

¶25

of 2015 of Ayiroor Police station. He along with the coaccused is alleged to have been committed the offences under Secs.143, 147, 148, 149, 294B, 447, 323, 324, 506 (2), 395, 308 and 427 of Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that on 27.03.2015 at 1.00 a.m. the accused assaulted the 1^st informant on the head with weapons like iron rod causing him serious injuries and committed theft of a mobile phone and a gold chain and caused damage to the properties of a school, the director of which was the first informant.

¶26

Heard both sides.

¶27

The wound certificate of the victim shows

¶28

that he sustained a wound on the head. This probablises the prosecution version that the victim was assaulted on the head with an iron rod. It was the petitioner who

¶29

Bail Appl. No.2435 of 2015 2

¶30

allegedly assaulted the victim with iron rod. The mobile phone which the first informant lost was recovered from the custody of a relative of the petitioner. The gold chain is yet to be recovered. Prima facie the petitioner has committed the offences alleged against him.

¶31

Having regard to these facts it is not at all

¶32

proper to grant him anticipatory bail.

¶33

In the result, this bail application is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶34

the petitioner will surrender before the investigating officer. He may do so if he is so advised.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE

¶37

/ True Copy /

¶38

¶39

P.A. To Judge

M.Thulaseedharan @ Kutty v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Thulaseedharan @ Kutty v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyothi Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Musthafa Vs State of Kerala

Joseph M.G. Vs the State of Kerala

Manikandan Vs State of Kerala

Ameerjan Vs State of Kerala

Ajeesh Vs State of Kerala