Ameerjan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences of cheating, forgery, and passport violation was heard. The court granted bail to the second petitioner but dismissed the application for the first petitioner due to a prima facie case.
What did the court decide?
Second petitioner released on bail with specific conditions; application of first petitioner dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 1776 of 2015 ()
CRIME NO. 39/2015 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 & 2 :
--------------------------------------------------
1. AMEERJAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.HANEEFA, KATTUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR, KALLUMTHAZHAM P.O., KOLLAM.
2. SHAJAHAN, AGED 44 YEARS,S/O.HANEEFA, PUTHEN VILA KISHAKKETHIL, ROSE NAGAR 78, NEAR CHUMADUTHAGI JUNCTION, MANGADU, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.RAJA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail ought to be granted to the second petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in light of lack of reliable evidence against him.
Whether bail conditions should be imposed despite the offence being committed in 1989 and discovered recently.
Whether the application filed by the first petitioner should be allowed or dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMEERJAN
- petitioner
SHAJAHAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court