P.a.Hamsa v. the Branch Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, considering the nature of the relief sought, with no substantive grounds analyzed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/15TH KARTHIKA, 1936
WP(C).No. 9786 of 2013 (W)
PETITIONER :-
1. P.A.HAMSA, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.ABDUL KHADER, PUNCHATHUNDI HOUSE, ANJUMURI ROAD THAMMANAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682032.
2. MAHINSHA.P.H, AGED 19 YEARS S/O.P.A.HAMSA, PUNCHATHUNDI HOUSE, ANJUMURI ROAD THAMMANAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682032.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH
SMT.M.J.POURNIMA
RESPONDENTS :-
1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, THAMMANAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM PIN-682032.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.A. HAMSA
- petitioner
MAHINSHA. P. H
- respondent
THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA
- respondent
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court