Dismissed
Jyothishkumar v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/19078/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
WP(C).No. 19078 of 2014 (H)
PETITIONER :
------------------
JYOTHISHKUMAR,
S/O.KRISHNAN, ALUVILAKATHUVEEDU, T.C. NO. 49/118 MPRA - 11, KALIPPANKULAM, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV
SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 581.
4. MITHRAPURAM RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION, KALIPPANKULAM, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
5. SMT.VILASINI
6. SMT.GEETHA, D/O.KRISHNAN, SOORYAVILAKAM, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009.
7. SMT.REMANI, D/O.KRISHNAN, SOORYAVILAKAM, MANACAUD P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009.
WP(C).No. 19078 of 2014 (H)
8. SRI.ASHOKAN S/O.KRISHNAN, PULARI, KALIPPANKULAM MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009.
R1 TO R 3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFI M. R4 BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C R5 TO R8 BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No. 19078 of 2014
Dated this the 11th day of December,2015
J U D G M E N T
-----------------------
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter
has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
jm/
JYOTHISHKUMAR
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MITHRAPURAM RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION
SMT.VILASINI
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court