Salija.T.S. v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon the counsel's submission that the matter had become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/22ND KARTHIKA, 1936
WP(C).No. 1235 of 2012 (D)
PETITIONER(S):
SALIJA. T.S., W/O.PRAKASH BABU K.S., 'KIZHIYATHU VEEDU (H)', NALLOORNADU P.O., DWARAKA, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 670 645.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, NALLORNADU, NALLOORNADU P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 670 643.
3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OFFICE, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 005.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saliya. T.S., W/O.Prakash Babu K.S.
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Mananthavady
- respondent
The Village Officer, Village Office, Nallornadu
- respondent
Kerala Public Service Commission
- respondent
The District Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission, Kalpetta North
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court