Praveen.W.J. v. the Managing Director,Serifed,Trivandrum
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
WP(C).No.10897 of 2009 (F)
PETITIONER:
PRAVEEN.W.J,S/O.WILLIAM YESUDAS, THODIVEEDU,ATTAYAMPATHY P.O. PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA
RESPONDENTS:
1. KERALA STATE SERICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.(SERIFED),TC.NO.14/411, EXTRA POLICE ROAD,PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE SERICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.SERIFED,TC.NO.14/411,EXTRA POLICE ROAD, PALAYAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT SERICULTURE OFFICER, PALLATHERI.P.O.,PALAKKAD.
4. THE FIELD OFFICER,DISTRICT SERICULTURE OFFICE, PALLATHERI.P.O.,PALAKKAD.
R1 & R2 BY SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,SC,SERIFED
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
WP(C).No.10897 of 2009-F.
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2014.
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
writ petition has become infructuous. Hence dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, (Judge)
Kvs/-
( true copy )
PA TO JUDGE.
PRAVEEN.W.J
KERALA STATE SERICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.SERIFED
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE SERICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.SERIFED
THE DISTRICT SERICULTURE OFFICER, PALLATHERI
THE FIELD OFFICER,DISTRICT SERICULTURE OFFICE, PALLATHERI
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court