Anwar Hussain v. Kamalobhavan
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge judgment. Appellant filed a writ appeal against a judgment ordering the RTA to consider a matter. Court discharged the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/10TH BHADRA, 1936
WA.No. 533 of 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32186/2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT, DATED 03-02-2014
APPELLANT(S)/4TH RESPONDENT IN W.P(C):
M.ANWAR HUSSAIN, MIDLAND, VENJARAMOODU.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1,2,3 & 5 IN W.P(C):
1. N.KAMALOLBHAVAN, A.M.C.13/423, MANI MANDIRAM, ATTINGAL.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Anwar Hussain
- respondent
N. Kamalolbhan
- respondent
The Regional Transport Authority, Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The District Transport Officer, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court